Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Letter to the editor - Dr. Smith on improvements in the ER

"A team effort helped to turn things around here"
http://www.registerbee.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=DRB%2FMGArticle%2FDRB_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1149193280630&path=!news!editor

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

From Cain Creek Cripple:

Here are two letters from the Chatham Star-Tribune concerning the brouhaha in Ben Davenport’s Chatham Baptist Church. It started when Davenport’s minister took to the newspaper to defend the boys at the bank. The first letter below appeared in response to the second letter, which is the one Davenport’s minister wrote:

From Chatham Star-Tribune
February 21, 2007

Dear Editor:

Rascals forever have scurried for the high ground of religion and patriotism when confronted with unpleasant realities.

Comes now the Reverend Charles Warnock, certainly no rascal, but the shepherd of the flock at Chatham Baptist Church.

That is the church I grew up in, and I resent the way in which Mr. Warnock is using his position to shield those who should be exposed in public for what they have done to our community.

In a letter to your newspaper, Mr. Warnock objected to the "tone" of recent commentary in your pages.

He was clearly referring to letters critical of the " Boys at the Bank" who secretly sold Danville Regional Medical Center for more money than they know what to do with. Mr. Warnock criticized what he called "personal attacks" and urged people to "be polite" and observe the Golden Rule.

But in his sweet song of peace and tranquility, Mr. Warnock failed to disclose his own vested interest in these matters: His position as chairman of Chatham Cares, the newly created legal entity that was given $3 million of the money spun off by the hospital sale.

He thus has a powerful motive to disparage those who are outraged over the secret hospital sale.
He accuses them of making "personal attacks," when those dissenters have simply reported facts and voiced disagreement.

Accusing people who disagree with you of "personal attacks" is a tired old political gimmick, one particularly unbecoming to a Christian minister.

However, now that Mr. Warnock has entered this public forum, he could serve his fellow man by urging those who gave Chatham Cares $3 million to break their dishonorable silence and explain to the community what they propose to do about the disastrous hospital situation they have created.

Welcome to the debate, Mr. Warnock, but please refrain from misleading your flock and others by accusing those with whom you disagree of "personal attacks." Doing so cheapens your distinguished position and that of Chatham Cares.

Dixie Shorter Doss
Danville

*********

The original letter from Davenport's minister:

Dear Editor:
As a pastor and relative newcomer to the Chatham community, I am concerned by the tone of several letters to the editor.

I have not written before now, thinking that time would mellow the conversation, but it has not.
Newspapers provide a wonderful forum for engaging in public dialogue and debate about ideas and points-of-view.

Civic discussion is a grand tradition that is as old as civilization itself. Frank, healthy give-and-take is good for a community as its citizens clarify their values and decide on future action together.

What is not helpful are personal attacks on individuals who are our friends, neighbors, and fellow Southsiders.

In a community where churches dot the landscape, we could use a little more Christian charity in our public conversation.


If you disagree with a decision, voice your opposition and with a reasoned argument make your case to the reading public, but be polite.

I don't know how you were raised, but my mama would have whipped me if she caught me making unkind remarks to a playmate.

The "Golden Rule" of doing unto others as we would have them do unto us still applies.

Let's raise the level of our public debate to a standard worthy of ourselves, this wonderful community, and of the Christ whose faith many of us profess.

The Rev. Chuck Warnock
Chatham Baptist Church
Chatham

Anonymous said...

I DON'T CARE HOW CRIPPLED CAIN CREEK CRIPPLE IS HE DOES NOT HAVE ANY BUSINESS DRAGGING BEN DAVENPORT'S CHURCH INTO THIS MESS YOU PEOPLE HAVE STIRRED UP. IT IS UNBELIEVABLE TO ME THAT AFTER ALL MR. DAVENPORT HAS DONE FOR SO MANY PEOPLE TO HAVE YOU DRAG HIS CHURCH INTO THIS MESS. SHAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Hospital employees as well as members of the community need to take note that no authority is given for the so-called "good news" being trumpeted by LifePoint. These are their figures, and given their abysmal record of lying to employees and to the community, is there any reason to believe them? They claim that the "progress" in the ER can become a template for changes throughout DRMC. It is foolish to pay attention to anything coming confirmed liars.

--BEEN THERE AND GONE

Anonymous said...

Mr. ALL CAPS,
Mr. Davenport's church entered this debate by writing a letter to the editor.
"Civic discussion is a grand tradition that is as old as civilization itself."

I wholeheartedly agree that the Golden Rule does apply...no one should attack the person of Ben Davenport or his family, but putting yourself into the role of community benefactor does demand that a certain level of bright light be shone on your actions.

Anonymous said...

If you like bright lights so much, why isn't anyone putting the high-beams on the great benefactor Bob Ashby who is as guilty as all the rest of them for selling us down the river? Why doesn't someone expose him for all his money-grubbing activities around town? You can claim he is just a figurehead for the big boys, but he is now the main man in spending our $200 million, and don't forget he is supposed to be a medical man, and he must bear a special responsibility for selling us down the river for cash. --Getting Sicker.

Anonymous said...

I think the comment above could be read to mean anyone who put themself "into the role of community benefactor does demand that a certain level of bright light be shone on your actions."
That certainly applies to everyone on the DRF board.

Anonymous said...

BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The hospital was not, I repeat was NOT accredited>

Anonymous said...

Yes, there are some serious issues that must be reckoned with soon. I also understand that Mr. Arthur "once again" easily put a spin on the truth with his presentation to staff. Oh well, would the man know the truth if it hit him in the face...I afraid not.
Does he not understand that "the truth will set us free".

Anonymous said...

I see Mr. All Caps is worrying about damaging Ben Davenport's church in Chatham by criticising its pastor. If he knew anything about that church, he would know that people have been dropping out of there like flys sprayed with Raid. Something about an oppressive atmosphere. No one has to wonder why the pastor rushed into print to defend the bank boys. Do you really think he had any choice? .WINDY CITY