Saturday, August 18, 2007

"Surgeon cites finances in departure"

Danville Register & Bee
Friday, August 17, 2007

DANVILLE - When Dr. Lee McCann moved to Danville two years ago, he thought his family would stay here until his children graduated from high school. His youngest of five children is 2.
Offers from other hospitals have come and gone throughout the two years McCann has been the medical director of cardiovascular surgery at Danville Regional Medical Center and on the staff at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C.
The doctor didn’t consider any of the offers, however, until about six months ago when his patient load decreased because, he believes, patients no longer wanted to be treated at DanvilleRegional.
“Things have gotten so bad at Danville Regional that when we got another offer, we had to look at it,” McCann said Monday. “You get offers all the time. We have gotten multiple offers over the last two years, and we haven’t even looked at them because we love it here and wanted to stay.”
His situation, however, has changed considerably since he came to Danville, accepting his first full-time job after 17 years of medicaleducation.“My office is now in the red, and I can’t keep losing money,” McCann said. “Duke has probably lost money as well, and they are getting scared.”When he got the offer from Utah Valley Regional Medical Center in Provo, Utah, McCann told Dr. Peter Smith, chief of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at Duke, he would have to consider it.
The hospital responds
Danville Regional spokesman John Van Mol said the hospital or its parent company, LifePoint Hospitals Inc., shouldn’t shoulder the blame for McCann’s departure.
“When there is an insufficient number of patients in a particular service line, there are almost always a variety of factors that cause it. A variety of reasons, too, no doubt caused the previous open heart surgeon at the hospital to make a decision to leave, well in advance of LifePoint’s purchase of the hospital,” Van Mol said Friday in a written statement. “Therefore, it is inaccurate to say low patient volume is ‘LifePoint’s fault,’ just as it is inaccurate to say it is ‘the surgeon’s fault’ or ‘Danville Regional’s fault,’ or ‘referring physicians’ fault.’”
A news release from the hospital issued Monday announced not only the departure of McCann, but also that Duke would work together with Danville Regional to conduct a “service line assessment” to “determine how (Danville Regional) and Duke will work together to improve cardiovascular care” at the hospital.
“(Duke) can’t keep pouring resources into the hospital,” McCann said. “Duke is afraid, and anything they put their name on has to succeed. Duke agreed to look at it, but by no means agreed to anything.
“They agreed to look at this mess and see if they can help fix it,” he added. “They might agree that it’s too bad, and they won’t go down in flames with the hospital. Or they could fix it, and it would cost Danville Regional a boatload of money.
“There are no guarantees from Duke. But, for all I know, they could turn around in a year and say they could do it. They’re not ruling any possibilities out.”
McCann said he and his wife have agonized over this for six months and have done everything they could to avoid it, but in the end he left because “I couldn’t pay my practice’s bills.”
Van Mol said, “It is true that the revenue from the practice has failed to cover its costs, but all the costs including full pay and benefits for Dr. McCann have been covered by Danville Regional and LifePoint.”
In his own announcement sent to his physician colleagues, McCann wrote, “The situation here has deteriorated to the point that the future of my fairly young career and that of my family are very insecure. Changes in the hospital ownership and administration, and, importantly, public perception of these changes have significantly altered our practice, both in terms of quality and volume.
“Frankly, patients no longer want to come to this hospital for cardiac surgical care despite my best efforts to establish a good program and a respectable reputation ... It will take time for the hospital to gain enough trust back so that patients will return.”During Monday’s interview, he said, “I would like to see the hospital survive and succeed, but in order to do that, there has to be open, honest dialogue. LifePoint needs to do that.”

‘a battle’
“What Dr. McCann says is true,” Dr. Gary Miller, a cardiologist and the hospital’s former chief of staff, said Tuesday. “He did like the community.”Miller called the heart program at Danville Regional a “best-kept secret.”“It was working,” he said. “The infection and mortality rates were extremely low, but people probably didn’t know that.“ But we do catheterizations and recommend surgery, but people say they have heard about the hospital and assume the heart program is not doing well, which it was. One section of the hospital is rubbing off on the other.”
Miller said the heart doctors have been seeing people with a relatively low risk for heart surgery, but the patients are refusing to have it done at Danville Regional and doctors have to send them elsewhere.“
It’s been a battle,” he said. “We’ve always had an agreement with Duke that we would send them the high-risk patients - those that have a 10 to 15 percent chance of dying - but when we have to give up people that will do well, that’s hard.”Miller said that the patient census has been very heavy the last few days, and he did seven angioplasties in seven days because of the effect the hot weather has had on people. “But I have known the surgery numbers have been down for some time because people are opting to go elsewhere because of the things that have gone on in the hospital,” Miller said. “There is always a small minority who have gone out of town (for care), but what has really hurt is that now the average Joe citizen who could stay here is leaving.”
Miller is hopeful, however, that the situation at the hospital will improve soon.“We’ve been working with LifePoint, and I think the interim people here are now much more responsive to the physicians and patients,” he said. “We are being listened to.”Miller said he is confident the hospital will retain its Joint Commission accreditation, but called the effect of McCann’s leaving “demoralizing.”
“The people who work there are proud of the heart program,” he said. “The whole team knew they were doing a good job, and it is very demoralizing to those who worked hard to bring the program here.
“If a program fails because they’re not doing a good job, that’s one thing, but it was not failing. It failed for other reasons.
“It’s a downward spiral, and it feeds on itself.”Miller said he thinks the doctors and nurses are gradually regaining the confidence of the patients.
“We’ve hired enough nurses,” he said. “Even though they are young nurses, we have enough. We have episodic shortages, but it’s not every day.
“But LifePoint has to continue to do what they said they would do. They have to provide enough staff and not worry about the bottom line. If we give good service and people are happy, then business will be good.“We still have a long way to go. We haven’t given up on the heart center. We are going to look at it.”

‘support the hospital’
Cardiologist Dr. Bosh Zakhary said the community deserves part of the blame for the low-patient census at the hospital. “I think the whole community is blaming the hospital, but part of the responsibility lies with the community,” he said Thursday. “The physicians haven’t changed, the programs haven’t changed and LifePoint has realized they have made mistakes and they are rectifying those.”
He took issue with a study that came out recently that reported higher mortality rates among heart patients at Danville Regional. In the study published in June, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a division of the Health and Human Services, ranked Danville as one of the seven worst hospitals nationwide for heart attack mortality rates.
Although that study did not concern the cardiovascular surgery program McCann headed, Zakhary said the community was influenced by it. “The outcomes published recently on heart care were erroneous, and we are looking at this,” he said. “Other studies show better outcomes.”
Zakhary said people in the community were not happy with the sale of the hospital, so any time a problem is reported with the hospital, the community’s perception is blown out of proportion. “When people see the problems, they do not come to the hospital,” he said, “and that led to Dr. McCann leaving.”
Changes in the hospital, such as the flow in the emergency department and how heart patients are handled, are occurring, which will result in equal or better care than before the sale, Zakhary said.
“The rest will be up to the community,” he said. “They need to stay in town and support the hospital. We can only do what we can do.”

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

Lots of honest comment in this story. Bless McCann's heart for being willing to lay it out. It is deeply unfair of this community to expect top doctors to remain when our facility has been wrecked by LifePoint. And it is doubly unfair for LifePoint to suggest that the community is at fault.

They have wrecked our hospital, so of course we all must go elsewhere.

Anonymous said...

I just noted another DRMC PR letter in the paper today. These people are shameless--and take us for such fools if they think we believe those letters are spontaneous.

.

Anonymous said...

“Things have gotten so bad at Danville Regional that when we got another offer, we had to look at it,” McCann said Monday.
For everyone who believes anything
lifepoint says , well here you go.
Godspeed Dr. McCann, you, your respectability, demeanor, and true professionalism will be missed .A young surgeon that had planned to stay( before lifepoint)elevated our game only to be destroyed by the hell that is lifepoint.
Now maybe the nonlisteners will
now believe we are in hell(lifepoint).

Anonymous said...

All of these doctors that use American National Bank should go to a new bank with their business and let the board see how it is to watch your income decline.

Anonymous said...

Rock on Dr. McCann!! Sometimes the truth hurts.

Oh and I have heard that Carevue for ICU has been put on hold, compliments of the new CFO. I guess the old staffing grids will be reimplemented next! I can hardly wait for the sinking ship to finish capsizing.

Anonymous said...

Dr. McCann moved easily into a new situation. It is because of his superb training, his ability to deal with others, expecially his staff and patients.

McCann's concerns surely are concerns that nearly every doctor at Lifepoint/DRMC feels. But so many of them have weak verbal skills and have been trained in schools many of us have never heard of. This is not to say they are bad doctors, but if those types are as fed up as McCann,,,and IF they cannot move on....doesn't that worsen the atmosphere here for patients? Isn't this yet another way that LifePoint is destroying medical care in our community--by fiostering such awful work conditions/

Anonymous said...

So where's the new ceo?

When are we gonna hear about the union meeting?

Anonymous said...

Nice little blog you got here. I live in Texas and just heard about it. You folks're in for a big ride.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of corporate shuffles, I see in the financial press that Columbia Flooring including the Danville plant got sold to Mohawk last week. Some of the other plants are announced as expanding, but nothing said in the articles about Danville's plant. Anybody heard? Are they going to rev up, or ship out?

Anonymous said...

Sometimes the integrity of a business/corporation/istitution of any kind should be evaluated.

This is difficult and takes time.

When lpnt shows its true colors to the community, the healthcare decisions should be easier to make.
Until that happens, which seems like it will take a very long time, everyone suffers.

Unfortunately, things like this take a long time to sort through. It takes paths of research, soul searching, and lot of prayer by everyone to get to the real source of the problems. Within these decisions, one has to decide which came first "the chicken or the egg".

Then you must decide if they were "original or crispy", as well as "medium, over-easy, or scrambled."

The most important thing here, is what we can learn through what is shared, and learn to grow from it all.

Anonymous said...

In the basic sphere of it all opposites will always attract.

However, if you learn to speak eye to eye, love could be the answer.

Anonymous said...

After all, love does make the world go around doesn't it?

Anonymous said...

"Nice little blog you got here. I live in Texas and just heard about it. You folks're in for a big ride."

Please elaborate......

Anonymous said...

Fitch: Bad Debt Expense, Weak Volumes Challenge U.S. For-Profit Hospitals
Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Fitch Ratings reported that bad debt expense and stagnant volumes continued to challenge the U.S. for-profit hospital industry in the second quarter of 2007. After a brief moderation in the first quarter, bad debt expense resumed accelerating this quarter. Rising bad debt expense, uncompensated care and/or self-pay admissions growth was reported by every provider in the industry, with Health Management Associates, Inc. (HMA) and LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (Lifepoint) particularly hard hit. Fitch expects that bad debt expense and uncompensated care levels will continue to challenge the industry for the remainder of 2007.

In addition to bad debt expense, the industry continues to be challenged by weak volumes. For the first time in a year, same store admissions growth turned negative for the sector. The average growth in same store admissions for the quarter was a negative 0.3% while same store adjusted admissions grew 1.3%. As with the first quarter, Universal Health Services (UHS) recorded the greatest gain in admissions, while Tenet and HCA lost the most volume. Fitch believes that recent pressure on volumes has resulted from numerous factors, including increased competition from specialty hospitals and a shift in procedures from the inpatient setting into outpatient settings or even the doctor's office. Ultimately, volume growth should accelerate as a result of favorable demographics in the U.S.; however, Fitch expects volumes to remain near 1% over the near term.

Although the overall sector had a difficult quarter, some providers performed better than others. UHS had another strong quarter, with same store admissions growth of 1.9% and same store adjusted admissions growth of 4% for its acute care facilities. In addition, UHS was one of the few providers to expand its EBITDA margin this quarter. HCA was also one of the better performers this quarter. Although HCA's volumes declined, strong pricing and favorable mix shifts led to continued EBITDA margin expansion this quarter. In contrast, Lifepoint and HMA were among the most challenged this quarter, with both companies reporting declining EBITDA margins and escalating bad debt expense. Tenet also continues to struggle, with the lowest admissions growth and EBITDA margins in the industry.

Additional trend discussions, financial comparisons, and operating metrics are available for each issuer and in aggregate in 'Fitch's For Profit Hospital Industry Quarterly Diagnosis: Second Quarter, 2007' special report. Volumes, pricing, capital expenditures, inpatient versus outpatient, and other metrics are provided as well as comparisons of rural versus urban operators. In addition, Fitch discusses the final 2008 inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) and its implications for the sector.

The full report is available on the Fitch Ratings web site at www.fitchratings.com.

Anonymous said...

So basically not only are for profits poorly managed and for lack of a better term greedy, the highly insured cash cows that generate the most theivable income for CEO's are declining as insurance companies doctors and businesses become wise to for profit tactics. Also insured people are trusting their physicians and having specific procedures done in well staffed facilities instead of the bare bones facilities of a forprofit hospital(ie,lifepoint)
Just as mother nature will reclaim her own Non profits and MD's and patients will regain control of healthcare from the greed driven corporation.

Anonymous said...

Accountability lacking? It is worse now. RUTHless functions with little to no accountaiblity. She is a pro in deflecting the blame to others and protecting her little den of followers. she appears to work well with Anderson but i think he is smart and is biding his time until this snake leaves. She will be the ruin of this organization, nursing practice and accountability but she will never receive the credit. She has done this before she is a pro in assurring others take the heat.

Anonymous said...

Fitch: Bad Debt Expense, Weak Volumes Challenge U.S. For-Profit Hospitals
Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Fitch Ratings reported that bad debt expense and stagnant volumes continued to challenge the U.S. for-profit hospital industry in the second quarter of 2007. After a brief moderation in the first quarter, bad debt expense resumed accelerating this quarter. Rising bad debt expense, uncompensated care and/or self-pay admissions growth was reported by every provider in the industry, with Health Management Associates, Inc. (HMA) and LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (Lifepoint) particularly hard hit. Fitch expects that bad debt expense and uncompensated care levels will continue to challenge the industry for the remainder of 2007.

In addition to bad debt expense, the industry continues to be challenged by weak volumes. For the first time in a year, same store admissions growth turned negative for the sector. The average growth in same store admissions for the quarter was a negative 0.3% while same store adjusted admissions grew 1.3%. As with the first quarter, Universal Health Services (UHS) recorded the greatest gain in admissions, while Tenet and HCA lost the most volume. Fitch believes that recent pressure on volumes has resulted from numerous factors, including increased competition from specialty hospitals and a shift in procedures from the inpatient setting into outpatient settings or even the doctor's office. Ultimately, volume growth should accelerate as a result of favorable demographics in the U.S.; however, Fitch expects volumes to remain near 1% over the near term.

Although the overall sector had a difficult quarter, some providers performed better than others. UHS had another strong quarter, with same store admissions growth of 1.9% and same store adjusted admissions growth of 4% for its acute care facilities. In addition, UHS was one of the few providers to expand its EBITDA margin this quarter. HCA was also one of the better performers this quarter. Although HCA's volumes declined, strong pricing and favorable mix shifts led to continued EBITDA margin expansion this quarter. In contrast, Lifepoint and HMA were among the most challenged this quarter, with both companies reporting declining EBITDA margins and escalating bad debt expense. Tenet also continues to struggle, with the lowest admissions growth and EBITDA margins in the industry.

Additional trend discussions, financial comparisons, and operating metrics are available for each issuer and in aggregate in 'Fitch's For Profit Hospital Industry Quarterly Diagnosis: Second Quarter, 2007' special report. Volumes, pricing, capital expenditures, inpatient versus outpatient, and other metrics are provided as well as comparisons of rural versus urban operators. In addition, Fitch discusses the final 2008 inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) and its implications for the sector.

Anonymous said...

"the industry continues to be challenged by weak volumes"

Hmmmm I wonder how we could increase our volumes?
Possibly by ADDING instead of eliminating services?
Possibly by having the reputation we once did?

Anonymous said...

FROM THE REGISTER AND BEE

To the editor:
Recent events have me very concerned about our local hospital.
Dr. Lee McCann has decided to leave Danville Regional Medical Center for another position in Utah, “Surgeon cites finances in departure,” (Aug. 18, page A1).
Dr. McCann has been the director of cardiovascular surgery here and he is on the staff at Duke University Medical Center. He is leaving due to a decreased patient load, which he states is due to local patients no longer wanting to receive treatment at Danville Regional.
Local cardiologists, such as Dr. Gary Miller and Dr. Bosh Zakhary, state the infection and mortality rates are extremely low in the cardiovascular surgery department, but add the general negative perception of the hospital by local citizens has rubbed off, resulting in more Danville and Pittsylvania County patients opting to have their heart surgery done at Duke University Medical Center or Moses Cone Hospital.
I believe local citizens must utilize our own medical facility in order for it to remain financially stable, therefore, maintaining a good local hospital for all of us in Danville and surrounding communities to have access for our medical care.
If I had heart surgery at Duke, I would not want my wife driving all the way to and from Durham, N.C., each day. Obviously, distance is not the most decisive factor in the equation of what medical facility to use, however, we have excellent physicians and staff at Danville Regional. I certainly would not elect to have surgery out of town if it could be done locally.
I hear many stories and myths about Danville Regional. I have worked as a traveling nurse in Virginia, North Carolina and Florida and heard all the same stories about every medical facility in those three states.
Yes, our Emergency Department has long waits - as every other hospital emergency department does. Why? Because many people use it for their snotty noses rather than seeing a doctor during the day.
When a real patient comes in with respiratory distress or chest pain, that diagnosis pushes the minor-complaint patients back to the rear. In my opinion, most of the complaints about long waits come from these patients and their families, not from family members of patients who are experiencing acute distress.
I waited 12 hours in the emergency department at Moses Cone Hospital in Greensboro, N.C., several years ago. Why was I there? Because I had a problem during work at Cone and not because I chose to go there.
Dr. Miller also stated Danville Regional has now hired sufficient nurses to handle the patient load. Dr Zakhary stated the local community was not happy with the sale of Danville Regional and any time a problem has come up, local citizens have blown it out of proportion.
Committees have been formed and inquiries have been made, CEOs have come and gone and now the director of cardiovascular surgery is departing for greener pastures in Utah.
In my opinion, the time for talking has come and gone. We citizens must demand the local authorities force a sale of the hospital back to the community and tell LifePoint Hospitals Inc. to get out of town and don’t come back!
In the meantime, we should utilize our local hospital - or we may not have one.

DAVID W. GRAY SR.
Danville

Anonymous said...

REGISTER AND BEE


Why not get care here?

To the editor:
I read with interest, “Surgeon cites finances in departure” (Aug. 18, page A1), which outlined the reasons Dr. Lee McCann was leaving his position as medical director of cardiovascular surgery at Danville Regional Medical Center for a position at Utah Valley Regional Medical Center in Provo, Utah.
Included in the article was an outline of the opinion of local cardiologist Dr. Bosh Zakhary placing partial responsibility for low patient census on the community. He is quoted as saying, “They need to stay in town and support the hospital. We can only do what we can do.”
Can this be the same Dr. Bosh Zakhary who the Danville Register & Bee previously reported went to Duke University Hospital when he required cardiac surgery? If the Register & Bee is trying to emphasize a point of view, what is it?

PATRICIA PIERSON
Danville
Editor’s note: In the story, “Twist of fate - doctor becomes patient” (July 9, 2006, page A1), Dr. Zakhary cited privacy concerns, not care issues, as the main reason for his decision to seek care at Duke.

Anonymous said...

Those two letters to the editor were pretty generalized and a restatement of the article. I know for a fact that there have been other letters written with more substance than those two. Apparently, the paper has been threatened by Lifepoint again. How retarded is an opinion piece if there aren't really any opinions in them.

Anonymous said...

You got that right. The paper got the message when LifePoint jerked their ads before. I predict they will run perhaps one negative letter a month so they can have some pretense of honesty.

Don't forget, the same Bank Boys who sold us down the river on Danville Regional also sold our community newspaper to a conglomerate in Richmond.

Just like LifePoint, Media General cares about nothing but its bottom line, which is why they have such a pitiful staff.

When you are thanking the Bank Boys, don't forget what they did to us on the newspaper!

Anonymous said...

Newspaper? Does Danville have a newspaper?

Anonymous said...

Not really. Just a goofy idea-free daily cartoon of what a paper might be.

Anonymous said...

Of course the paper, in general, is terrible, but it's silly to smear every aspect of it. Old-timers like Susan Elzey, who wrote the story about Dr. McCann, is an excellent writer and reporter with strong roots in the community, Barbara Erickson writes good stories, and a new one named Rebecca Blanton is good. Bernie Baker is dependable.

But top-down, the people at the paper are there because they can't find jobs anywhere else. Media General is just another money sucker that takes all it can from the community and gives back as little as it can.

Point is, of course it's a terrible newspaper, but, like LifePoint/DRMC, it's all we've got, and changing it is very unlikely.

Anonymous said...

One question? When they continually posted negative letters and misquoted and created headlines that were misleading concerning the hospital it was honest? and when they begin to write about the positive and post positive letters it is dishonest?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Just the usual "pot stirrers" who cant stand it when something positive; or in this case, "not negative" occurs in the Lifepoint saga.

August 17, 2007 6:33:00 AM EST

It seems to fit...

Anonymous said...

You really miss the point. The paper carried all the negative stuff until they got the ads back, and now they run the "positive" letters from the LifePoint PR department....Watch what happens if the ads are pulled again.

In addition, complaints are way down. Paying customers were the ones who mainly complained, and they've wised up and taken their business elsewhere.

Youy LifePoint stooges think we are really dumb, don't you?

Anonymous said...

So , HOW is it going for the STARBUCKS group of directors?

Still BS'ing while the walls of DRMC crumble?

Anonymous said...

Yes.
And the paying customers are all gone, only folks now are the ones who can't make it somewhere else, really!

Anonymous said...

Why is it so hard for you to believe that someone could be complimentary of the care received at DRMC? It seems like the people on this blog want DRMC to close and put 1300 plus people out of work.

Anonymous said...

On an individual basis care can be fine as some of the staff is still here, as for an overall assessment from the inside extremely dangerous as all Joint comm, really considers is paperwork and hollow promises.

Unknown said...

we are offering and provide Best ENT Specialist in LahoreBest ENT Doctor in Lahore